ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs EX5 Pro Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 7715
OMR 10398
OMR 7371
OMR 9990
OMR 104
OMR 140
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 37.2
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
/
18
18
5
/
4430
4615
1818
1901
1635
1670
2610
2750
359/1166
/
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
/
45
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Smart Key
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
PVC Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.2
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
6
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
15.4
✓
/
✓
/
6
6
Transmission
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
168
218
88
/
180
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
