ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs HS3 1.5T Luxury Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 7715
OMR 10398
OMR 7371
OMR 9990
OMR 104
OMR 140
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 7
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 37.2
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 31
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 365
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
195
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
18
/
5
/
4430
4655
1818
1900
1635
1668
2610
2770
359/1166
/
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
18.7
45
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
6
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
8
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
235/55R18
215/55 R17
235/55R18
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5T
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
166 BHP
88
/
180
258
/
Direct Injection+Turbo Charging
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
