ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs 2008 GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 7715
OMR 10398
OMR 7371
OMR 9990
OMR 104
OMR 140
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 37.2
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 37.2
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
/
3
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
/
18
17
5
/
4430
4300
1818
1987
1635
1550
2610
/
359/1166
545
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
16.8
45
44
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
/
/
❌
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
10
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
Transmission
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.2
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
130
88
/
180
230
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
