Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD vs Ford Explorer 2024 2.3L EcoBoost XLT (Mid Option) AWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 19240
OMR 20570
OMR 18500
OMR 19750
OMR 259
OMR 277
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.32
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.24
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 56.27
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 40.92
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 481.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
180
6
4
Dimensions
8
7 Seater
5046
5049
1975
2004
1795
1775
2900
3025
470
515
Fuel Economy
9.4
12.8
74
67
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
300 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
420
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓