Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SL vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
OMR 8240
OMR 26068
OMR 7900
OMR 25036
OMR 111
OMR 351
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 30.69
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 56.27
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
210 km/h
4
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
✓
/
4.295
5115 mm
1.760
1980 mm
1.590
1920 mm
2.620
2890 mm
432
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
15.4
9.4 Km/L
41
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
9
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
4.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
118 BHP
271 BHP
149
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
