Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Ford Transit 2023 2.2L Custom 270S M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 11956
OMR 9500
OMR 11478
OMR 9100
OMR 161
OMR 128
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.91
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.37
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 56.27
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 28.21
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 332.15
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
Dimensions
3
3 Seater
2155
/
16
/
5265
4972
1950
2272
1990
2020
3210
2933
3200
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
/
/
6000
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
14.3
70
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
3.5
2.2 L
Gasoline
Diesel
277
125 BHP
351
350
Technologies
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
