GLC 200 4Matic vs Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
OMR 34691
OMR 35955
OMR 33355
OMR 34573
OMR 467
OMR 484
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.31
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 16.17
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 71.61
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 56.27
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 843.15
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
3460 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7
4656
5145 mm
1890
1980 mm
1639
1890 mm
2873
2850 mm
550
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
235 mm
Fuel Economy
7.1
9.3 Km/L
66
110 L
/
9.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12.3
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Engine
2.0
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
211 BHP
409 BHP
350
650 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
