Expedition 2025 XLT(200A) 4X2 vs Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 29496
OMR 14114
OMR 28379
OMR 13568
OMR 397
OMR 190
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.49
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.32
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 10.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.24
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 46.04
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 40.92
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 542.03
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 481.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
210
6
4
Dimensions
8
7 Seater
5636
5075
2029
1969
1941
1716
3343
2930
592
407
Fuel Economy
11
11.9
107
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
8
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Cloth
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
6
/
Transmission
✓
/
10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
275/65 R18
/
275/65 R18
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
380 BHP
226 BHP
637
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
