Expedition 2025 AWD vs Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
OMR 14114
TBD
OMR 13568
TBD
OMR 190
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.12 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.98
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.32
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 13.86
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.24
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 61.38
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 40.92
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 722.7
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 481.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
210
6
4
Dimensions
8
7 Seater
5636
5075
2029
1969
1941
1716
3343
2930
592
407
Fuel Economy
8.1
11.9
107
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
✓
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
3.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
440 BHP
226 BHP
691
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
