Dodge Charger 2024 3.6L GT vs Ford Taurus 2024 2.0L EcoBoost Trend Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 12920
OMR 15520
OMR 12400
OMR 14900
OMR 174
OMR 209
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 56.27
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 30.69
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
200
6
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5040
4972
1905
1875
1479
1498
3052
2930
455
520
/
205 mm
Fuel Economy
9.3
15.4
70
66
Comfort
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Smart Entry
Interior
Driver Seat
Front Row Seats
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Safety
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
/
13.2
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Exterior
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
/
/
/
/
/
Engine
3.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
300 BHP
232 BHP
358
388
/
L
/
Turbocharge
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
