300 Conqueror 2.0T vs Nissan X-Trail 2024 SL AWD (7-Seater) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Price Comparison
OMR 15295
OMR 15440
OMR 14672
OMR 14800
OMR 206
OMR 208
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.65
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 11.55
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 49.5
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 29.7
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 602.25
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
170
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4680
1930 mm
1840
1927 mm
1725
2750 mm
2705
400 L
135
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
15.4
75 L
60
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
188 BHP
387 Nm
244
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
