T01 Adventurer vs Nissan X-Trail 2024 SL AWD (7-Seater) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Price Comparison
OMR 13069
OMR 15440
OMR 12544
OMR 14800
OMR 176
OMR 208
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 56.27
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 30.69
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
2150
/
17"
/
4705
4680
1895
1840
1936
1725
2860
2705
1598
/
1598
/
235
/
40
/
36
/
23.6
/
/
135
Fuel Economy
9.1
15.4
80
60
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25-inch
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Front
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3-inch
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8AT
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
248 BHP
188 BHP
410
244
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
• Standard • Economic • Sport • Snow • Sand • Rock • Mud • Wade • Mountain • Uneven
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
