212 Adventure vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
OMR 13069
OMR 26068
OMR 12544
OMR 25036
OMR 176
OMR 351
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 54.45
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 54.45
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
2150
/
4705
5115 mm
1895
1980 mm
1936
1920 mm
2860
2890 mm
1598
/
1598
/
235
221 m
40
/
36
/
23.6
/
/
5 Doors
/
1004 L
Fuel Economy
9.1
9.4 Km/L
80
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Engine
2.0
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
248 BHP
271 BHP
410
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
