ZS 1.5T LUX vs Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
OMR 5040
TBD
OMR 4800
TBD
OMR 68
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.6
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 11.2
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 36
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 48
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 584
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
12.8
/
Engine / Motor
170
173
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4430
4315
1818
1822
1635
1682
2610
2673
359/1166
408
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
12.2
45
50
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
✓
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
135 BHP
/
195
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
