ZS 1.5T LUX vs All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
OMR 5041
TBD
OMR 4804
TBD
OMR 68
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 36
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
1235
17
/
5
/
4430
4341
1818
2052
1635
1693
2610
/
359/1166
478
145
/
/
1785
/
5.07
/
491
Fuel Economy
15.9
/
45
50
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
Front Driver & Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
Drum
215/55 R17
215/65 R16
215/55 R17
215/65 R16
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.6
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
115
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
