ZS 1.5L STD vs T1 Comfort 2026 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 5868
OMR 11064
OMR 5639
OMR 10618
OMR 79
OMR 149
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 30.69
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4705
1809
1967
1653
1843
2585
2800
359/1166
574
145
199
/
1690
/
1700
Fuel Economy
17.2
/
45
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
8AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
MacPherson
H Torsional Beam
Multi-link
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
Disc
215/55 R17
235/60 R19
215/55 R17
235/60 R19
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
254
88
/
180
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
