ZS 1.3T LUX vs 2008 GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 8463
OMR 10398
OMR 8111
OMR 9990
OMR 114
OMR 140
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 37.2
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 37.2
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
/
3
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
/
17
17
5
/
4323
4300
1809
1987
1653
1550
2585
/
359/1166
545
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
16.8
45
44
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
/
/
❌
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Virtual Cluster
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags Curtain Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
10
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
Transmission
6
/
6AT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Engine
1.3 L
1.2
Gasoline
Gasoline
160 BHP
130
120
/
230
230
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
