CarteaCompare CarsVolvo S40 2013 Comfort SE vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP)

Volvo S40 2013 Comfort SE vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Reliability and durability of high performance
  • Riding comfort and roomy interior design
  • Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs

Negative

  • Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
  • Traditional exterior and interior design
  • Lack of sportsmanship in control

Price Comparison

TBD

OMR 10694

TBD

OMR 10270

TBD

OMR 144

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.06 L/KM

0.07 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

OMR 0.99

Daily Fule Payment

OMR 1.16

Weekly Fule Payment

OMR 6.93

Weekly Fule Payment

OMR 8.09

Monthly Fule Payment

OMR 29.7

Monthly Fule Payment

OMR 34.65

Yearly Fule Payment

OMR 361.35

Yearly Fule Payment

OMR 421.58

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

215

195 km/h

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4476

4885 mm

1770

1840 mm

1454

1445 mm

2460

2824 mm

404

493 L

/

4 Doors

Fuel Economy

17.5

14.9 Km/L

55

60 L

/

14.9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Manual

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

145 BHP

204 BHP

185

243 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Volvo | Volvo S40 2013 Comfort SE

VS

Changan | Alsvin 1.5L Advanced

Volvo | Volvo S40 2013 Comfort SE

VS

Nissan | Nissan Sunny 2019 1.5L SV

Volvo | Volvo S40 2013 Comfort SE

VS

Nissan | Nissan Sunny 2018 1.5L SV

Volvo | Volvo S40 2013 Comfort SE

VS

Nissan | Nissan Sunny 2018 1.5 SL

Volvo | Volvo S40 2013 Comfort SE

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GL

Volvo Related Car

Toyota Related Car

Toyota Related Used Car