Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V8 vs Alsvin 1.5L Advanced Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Competitive price compared to competitors
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features for its class
Negative
- Limited internal space
- Material quality can be improved
- Engine performance is limited on highways
Price Comparison
TBD
OMR 5126
TBD
OMR 4929
TBD
OMR 69
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.13 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.15
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.32
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 15.02
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.24
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 66.5
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 40.92
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 782.93
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 481.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
/
8
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5059
4390 mm
1903
1725 mm
1450
1468 mm
2881
2535 mm
500
500 L
Fuel Economy
8.0
13 Km/L
90
45 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
4.2 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
335 BHP
105 BHP
430
145 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/