VF9 2025 Plus vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
TBD
OMR 5200
TBD
OMR 4999
TBD
OMR 70
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 36
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185
/
3
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
21
/
5119
4.314
2004
1.809
1691
1.624
3148
2.585
212
448
Fuel Economy
75
48
/
17.2
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front & Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
✓
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
11
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
15.6
✓
✓
✓
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Independent, Double Wishbone
/
Multi-link with Air Spring
/
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.3 L
Electric
Petrol
402 BHP
160 BHP
620
230
Motor
Dual Motor
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Eco / Normal / Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
