Urban Cruiser GL vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
OMR 8466
OMR 5868
OMR 8129
OMR 5639
OMR 114
OMR 79
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.83
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 5.78
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 25.58
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 30.69
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 301.13
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
170
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
17
4365
4323
1795
1809
1645
1653
2600
2585
210
145
/
1318
/
5
/
359/1166
Fuel Economy
19.8
17.2
45 L
45
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Key
✓
Manual
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
Fabric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Rear
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
10.1
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
4
4
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
215/55 R17
215/60 R17
215/55 R17
/
Disc
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
118 BHP
135
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
