Tucson 2025 Comfort 1.6L vs MG HS 2023 2.0T Luxury (AWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 9585
OMR 10320
OMR 9222
OMR 9900
OMR 129
OMR 139
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.49
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.32
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 10.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.24
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 46.04
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 40.92
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 542.03
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 481.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210
4
4
1596 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4500 mm
4574
1865 mm
1876
1650 mm
1685
2680 mm
2720
620 L
463
210 m
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
12.2
54 L
55
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
Keyless Entry
/
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✔
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Manual
/
✔
/
✔
/
Standard
/
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
Android LCD
/
✔
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
LED
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
177 BHP
231 BHP
264 Nm
360
Technologies
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
