Teramont R Line vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
OMR 21318
OMR 26068
OMR 20488
OMR 25036
OMR 287
OMR 351
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.65
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 11.55
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 49.5
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 54.45
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 602.25
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210 km/h
4
6
1998 cc
3490 cc
European
GCC
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
21
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
5103
5115 mm
1990
1980 mm
1787
1920 mm
2980
2890 mm
583
1004 L
180
221 m
Fuel Economy
9.7 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
70 L
110 L
9.7 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
6
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
270 BHP
271 BHP
370 Nm
385 Nm
/
Twin Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
