Tahoe LS vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
OMR 25038
OMR 26068
OMR 24087
OMR 25036
OMR 337
OMR 351
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.65
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 11.55
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 49.5
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 54.45
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 602.25
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
18
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
5181
5115 mm
2053
1980 mm
1925
1920 mm
3071
2890 mm
3479
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
9.7
9.4 Km/L
100
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
8
/
✓
/
Gideon/Dark Atmosphere premium cloth
Fabric
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
frontal airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; seat-mounted side-impact airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; driver inboard seat-mounted side-impact airbag; headcurtain airbags for all rows in outboard seating positions3,4
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
9
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
/
10
/
10AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
5.3 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
355 BHP
271 BHP
518
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
