T99 LIM vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
OMR 10912
OMR 26068
OMR 10459
OMR 25036
OMR 147
OMR 351
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.16
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.09
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 35.81
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 56.27
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 421.58
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
1805
/
20 inch
/
4800
5115 mm
1915
1980 mm
1685
1920 mm
2870
2890 mm
377
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
13.8
9.4 Km/L
60
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
9
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
12
6
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Electronic Parking
/
245/50 R20
/
245/50 R20
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
224
271 BHP
165
/
340
385 Nm
95
/
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
