Shark 6 Premium vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 16558
OMR 17450
OMR 15890
OMR 16750
OMR 223
OMR 235
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.17
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.19
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 36.27
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 427.05
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
175
4
5
1500 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
5457 mm
5.362
1971 mm
1.976
1925 mm
1.816
3260 mm
3.221
1200 L
1180
230 mm
/
Fuel Economy
12.8
11.1
59 L
80
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
Android LCD
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Double-Wishbone
/
Double Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5T
3.2 L
Hybrid
Diesel
Single Turbo
/
4
/
430 BHP
200 BHP
650 Nm
470
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
