RAM 2500 2024 6.4L Power Wagon vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
OMR 30080
OMR 26068
OMR 28900
OMR 25036
OMR 405
OMR 351
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.15 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.48
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 17.33
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 74.25
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 54.45
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 903.38
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
8.6
/
Engine / Motor
8
6
/
210 km/h
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
6067
5115 mm
2119
1980 mm
2054
1920 mm
3792
2890 mm
1500
1004 L
/
7 Seater
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
6.7
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
0.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
410 BHP
271 BHP
580
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
