Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 24068
OMR 14710
OMR 23139
OMR 14148
OMR 324
OMR 198
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 15.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 14
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 66
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 60
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 803
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 730
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
200 km/h
6
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5046
4760 mm
1975
1930 mm
1795
1927 mm
2900
2750 mm
470
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
9.4
10 Km/L
74
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
224 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
387 Nm
340 @ 4,800
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
