Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S vs T01 Adventurer Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 7500
OMR 13069
OMR 7200
OMR 12544
OMR 101
OMR 176
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 30.69
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 56.27
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4295
4705
1760
1895
1590
1936
2620
2860
432
/
/
2150
/
17"
/
1598
/
1598
/
235
/
40
/
36
/
23.6
Fuel Economy
15.4
9.1
41
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.25-inch
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12.3-inch
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
8AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
248 BHP
149
410
/
Turbocharge
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
• Standard • Economic • Sport • Snow • Sand • Rock • Mud • Wade • Mountain • Uneven
/
✓
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)