Mustang Mach-E GT vs Hyundai Creta 2023 1.5L Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- A sophisticated and easy to use entertainment system
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Higher price compared to some competitors
- Average sound insulation on highways
Price Comparison
OMR 23031
OMR 8240
OMR 22153
OMR 7900
OMR 310
OMR 111
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.16
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.09
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 35.81
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 421.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
20
/
4712
4300
1881
1790
1597
1620
2984
2610
100+402
430
Fuel Economy
/
14.1
/
55
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
370
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Driver and Front-Passenger Dual-Stage, Driver Knee, Front-Seat Side-Impact, Rear-Seat Side-Impact, Side Curtain
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.5
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
10
/
B&O
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
Approx. 37 mins
/
150 kW
/
Approx. 14.0 hrs
/
10.5 kW
/
Transmission
AT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
✓
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.5 L
Electric
Gasoline
487
115 BHP
950
144
Motor
✓
/
2
/
Nickel Cobalt Manganese (NCM)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Whisper, Active, Untame, Untame Plus
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
