MG RX5 2024 1.5T STD vs MG HS 2023 2.0T Luxury (AWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 8387
OMR 10320
OMR 8031
OMR 9900
OMR 113
OMR 139
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.16
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.32
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.09
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.24
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 35.81
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 40.92
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 421.58
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 481.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
210
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4571
4574
1855
1876
1719
1685
2708
2720
430
463
Fuel Economy
14.7
12.2
55
55
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Transmission
✓
✓
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
171 BHP
231 BHP
275
360
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓