Land Cruiser GXR1 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2023 2.0T SE (200 PS) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 26289
OMR 22504
OMR 25244
OMR 21620
OMR 354
OMR 303
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.65
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.32
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 11.55
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.24
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 51.15
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 40.92
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 602.25
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 481.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
/
216
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5115
4395
1980
1984
1905
1649
/
2681
/
577
Fuel Economy
10.1
12.5
110
68.5
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Front Doors
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
/
Hi Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front + Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Central And Rear
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
409
200 BHP
650
320
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
