Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Ford Transit 2023 3.7L 150XL (Low Roof) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 11956
OMR 15220
OMR 11478
OMR 14600
OMR 161
OMR 205
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.14 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.8
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 15.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 19.6
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 66
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 84
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 803
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 1022
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
6
/
158
Dimensions
3
2 Seater
2155
/
16
/
5265
5.585
1950
2.065
1990
2.123
3210
3.302
3200
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
/
/
6986
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
7.0
70
95
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
3.5
3.7 L
Gasoline
Petrol
277
275 BHP
351
340
Technologies
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
