Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
OMR 11956
OMR 15292
OMR 11478
OMR 14657
OMR 161
OMR 206
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.04
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 15.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 7.28
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 66
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 31.2
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 803
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 379.6
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
Dimensions
3
3
2155
2360
16
16
5265
5915
1950
1950
1990
2280
3210
3860
3200
3500
5.5m
6.4m
2530 - 1760 - 1340
3180 - 1760 - 1605
6.2m³
9.3m³
1045
1140
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
12.6 Km/L
70
70
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
4.2
4.2
✓
✓
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
Driver & Front Passenger
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
2
2
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Drive
Macpherson Strut
Macpherson Strut
Leaf spring rigid
Leaf spring rigid
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
Drum
Drum
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
3.5
2.8
Gasoline
Diesel
277
174
351
450
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
