E300 3.0L vs Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Price Comparison
OMR 47477
OMR 10694
OMR 45682
OMR 10270
OMR 639
OMR 144
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.16
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.09
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 54.45
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 34.65
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 421.58
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
195 km/h
4
/
2998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4949 mm
4885 mm
1880 mm
1840 mm
1480 mm
1445 mm
2961 mm
2824 mm
540 L
493 L
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
66 L
60 L
9 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
285 BHP
204 BHP
420 Nm
243 Nm
