Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) vs K3 1.6L MPi Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 10694
OMR 7504
OMR 10270
OMR 7220
OMR 144
OMR 101
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.16
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.49
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.09
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 10.4
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 34.65
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 44.55
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 421.58
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 542.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
195 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1597 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4885 mm
4545 mm
1840 mm
1765 mm
1445 mm
1475 mm
2824 mm
2670 mm
493 L
544 L
/
160 m
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
11 Km/L
60 L
45 L
14.9 Km/L
11 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
204 BHP
121 BHP
243 Nm
150 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
