900 2.0T Ultra vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
TBD
OMR 26068
TBD
OMR 25036
TBD
OMR 351
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 54.45
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240
210 km/h
4
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
6
7 Seater
5240
5115 mm
1999
1980 mm
1810
1920 mm
3160
2890 mm
/
5 Doors
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
/
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front and Back Row Seats
✓
Front and Back Row Seats
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
275/45 R21
/
275/45 R21
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
540 BHP
271 BHP
1038
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
