X55 LV2 vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
OMR 6234
OMR 5868
OMR 5967
OMR 5639
OMR 84
OMR 79
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 30.69
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1550
1318
4620
4323
1886
1809
1680
1653
2735
2585
1970
/
350
359/1166
160
145
/
17
/
5
Fuel Economy
53
45
/
17.2
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Dual Airbags
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Driver And Passenger
/
Infotainment
10
10.1
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
4
4
/
✓
Transmission
7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission
CVT
✓
/
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
Macpherson Independent Suspension
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
Multi-Link Independent Suspension
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
225/60 R18
215/55 R17
225/60 R18
215/55 R17
/
Disc
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
Engine
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
A156T2H
/
305
180
/
118 BHP
/
88
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
