300 Conqueror vs Prado TXR 2.4T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Strong performance in rough terrain
- Reliability and durability
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High maintenance and repair costs
- Traditional interior design
Price Comparison
OMR 16190
OMR 21830
OMR 15548
OMR 20949
OMR 218
OMR 294
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.32
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.49
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.24
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 10.4
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 40.92
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 46.04
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 481.8
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 542.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
2393 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760
4925 mm
1930
1980 mm
1927
1925 mm
2750
2850 mm
400 L
104 L
224
221 m
Fuel Economy
12.1
10.6 Km/L
75 L
110 L
10 Km/L
10.6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
3-Zone
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
224 BHP
267 BHP
387 Nm
430 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
