ZS 1.5T LUX vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.15
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 15.02
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 29.7
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 64.35
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 782.93
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
180
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4385
1809
1875
1653
1850
2585
2560
359/1166
500
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
7.7
45
69
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
✓
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
184 BHP
/
303
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
