ZS 1.5L STD vs T99 PRE Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 5868
OMR 10394
OMR 5639
OMR 9969
OMR 79
OMR 140
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.8
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 36
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 42
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 511
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
1775
17
19 inch
5
/
4323
4800
1809
1915
1653
1685
2585
2870
359/1166
377
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
14.1
45
60
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
6
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
245/50 R19
215/55 R17
245/50 R19
/
✓
/
Electronic Parking
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
224
88
165
180
340
/
Turbocharge
/
95
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
