ZS 1.5L STD vs HS 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 5868
OMR 8616
OMR 5639
OMR 8279
OMR 79
OMR 116
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.6
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 11.2
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 36
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 48
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 584
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
210 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4574 mm
1809
1876 mm
1653
1685 mm
2585
2720 mm
359/1166
463 L
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
12.2 Km/L
45
55 L
/
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
231 BHP
88
/
180
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
