ZS 1.5L STD vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 5868
OMR 14710
OMR 5639
OMR 14148
OMR 79
OMR 198
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.65
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 11.55
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 30.69
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 51.15
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 602.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
5 Doors
4323
4760 mm
1809
1930 mm
1653
1927 mm
2585
2750 mm
359/1166
400 L
145
224 m
Fuel Economy
17.2
10 Km/L
45
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Keyless Entry
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
4
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
224 BHP
88
/
180
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
