Wrangler Sahara 2.0T vs Tucson Comfort 1.6L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Price Comparison
OMR 28370
OMR 9585
OMR 27247
OMR 9222
OMR 382
OMR 129
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.31
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.49
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 16.17
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 10.4
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 71.61
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 46.04
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 843.15
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 542.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1596 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4785 mm
4500 mm
1877 mm
1865 mm
1869 mm
1650 mm
3007 mm
2680 mm
487 L
620 L
254 m
210 m
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
11 Km/L
87 L
54 L
7 Km/L
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Manual
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
10.25
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
6
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
270 BHP
177 BHP
400 Nm
264 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
