VF9 2025 Eco vs MG RX5 2023 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.16
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.09
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 34.65
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 421.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190
/
4
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
20
/
5119
4571
2004
1855
1691
1719
3148
2708
212
430
Fuel Economy
75
55
/
14.7
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front & Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
11
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
✓
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Independent, Double Wishbone
/
Multi-link with Air Spring
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.5 L
Electric
Gasoline
402 BHP
171 BHP
620
275
Motor
Dual Motor
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Eco / Normal / Sport
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
