Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort vs MG RX5 2023 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
OMR 6535
TBD
OMR 6274
TBD
OMR 88
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.16
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.09
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 34.65
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 421.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
SUV/
9.4
Engine / Motor
/
190
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
16
/
5
/
4200
4571
1760
1855
1570
1719
2555
2708
341
430
Fuel Economy
/
14.7
/
55
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
✓
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
1.5L
/
111 BHP
171 BHP
/
275
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
