Teramont R Line vs X5 M50i xDrive Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Price Comparison
OMR 21318
OMR 46510
OMR 20488
OMR 44750
OMR 287
OMR 626
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.65
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 11.55
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 49.5
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 54.45
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 602.25
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
250 km/h
4
/
1998 cc
/
European
/
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
21
/
5 Doors
/
5103
4922 mm
1990
2004 mm
1787
1745 mm
2980
2975 mm
583
645 L
180
/
Fuel Economy
9.7 Km/L
9.5 Km/L
70 L
83 L
9.7 Km/L
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
10.25
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0
4.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
270 BHP
530 BHP
370 Nm
750 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
