T Roc 2025 R Line vs MG RX5 2023 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
OMR 15665
TBD
OMR 15025
TBD
OMR 211
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.16
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.09
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 30.69
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 35.81
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 421.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
190
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4251
4571
1819
1855
1594
1719
2603
2708
445
430
Fuel Economy
15.8
14.7
50
55
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
8
/
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8 Speed Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
171 BHP
250
275
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
