RAV4 LTD 4X4 HEV vs Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 15517
OMR 15600
OMR 14883
OMR 14999
OMR 209
OMR 210
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 7
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 30
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 365
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
/
✓
Engine / Motor
4
N/A
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
18
/
4600
5.075
1855
1.969
1700
1.716
/
2.930
/
/
Fuel Economy
22.2
/
55
74
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Driver And Front Passenger
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
✓
7
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Knee + Side + Curtain
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
(steel) 165/80/17
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT)
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
225/60 R18
/
225/60 R18
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5
2.5 L
Hybrid
Petrol
219
226 BHP
221
420
Motor
121
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
