PATROL SE T2 vs Land Cruiser GXR3 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
OMR 28227
OMR 31054
OMR 27132
OMR 29867
OMR 380
OMR 418
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 14
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 60
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 730
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
8 Seater
7
18
20
5350
5115
2030
1980
1945
1945
3075
/
244
/
Fuel Economy
/
10.1
97
110
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Doors
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
Driver Seat
12.3
7
✓
✓
Monolith Display
/
Driver Seat
/
Leatherette
Hi Fabric
✓
✓
✓
Dual
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front+Side+Curtain+Driver Knee
Front + Knee + Side + Curtain
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
6
6
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
Central And Rear
9
/
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Electric Power Steering
/
/
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
265/70 R18
265/55 R20
265/70 R18
265/55 R20
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.8 L
3.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
3.8-LITER DOHC, V6, CVTCS DIG ENGINE
/
316 BHP
409
386
650
/
V
Technologies
✓
/
ROCK, SAND, ECO, MUD, STANDARD, SPORT
✓
✓
✓
Auto
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
